A State of States

It’s funny… There’s an article in the NYTimes today that talks about TV and the clip for the article reads, “Networks still pull in the biggest audiences, but they are losing the cultural and the financial battle to cable.” I think it’s amazing that as America, we have to redefine ourselves outside the mainstream, that as a country, free and all, we don’t chose to face the change required of a culture on the front pages and in our favorite television shows.

No, we need to expand our networks to cover-up the widely diversifying groups instead of keeping up with the constant changes inherent in any cultural system. We need cable in order to try and find anything that even remotely reflects us as a nation of people. So, there it is. It isn’t anything new. I was in fact born during the 60’s and saw the 70’s, the violence against its own people, to deny the basic rights in the Constitution that made this country seem so unique (assembly).

This kind of behavior as a culture, magnified by corporate dollar driven media, has been planned out since the turn of the 20th century. Shortly after WWI, the newly developed factories, that fueled the war, and the men who owned them started using a latent form of propaganda to create “want” driven consumers, when previously this country was driven by the basic needs we all share as human beings.

Over the next 90 years there has been a silent war in the hearts of this culture. We can see that the division between agreeing with this type of hypothetical control, and making our own choices is widening. The mainstream media is one one end of the spectrum, while the other is playing in underground clubs and talking about the planetary shift we are feeling.

Someone once said that the revolution would not be televised and I couldn’t agree with him more. As long as companies like General Electric, and Warner Brothers are projecting our lifestyles, it’s never going to amount to anything more than fiction at best. It will be kept a total secret if it can in any way undermine the current status quo. It will be homogenized watered down, cold filtered, artisan bullshit, aimed soley at your pocket books, in order to keep everyone spending. Because… Happy people don’t lead revolutions against power-hungry tyrants, which alleviates me…

But, I’m happy for different reasons. I love digging through the landscape of our culture to find those nook sub-cultures that are inherently filled with conscious people enjoying the simple act of gathering. We come together, not to share new ideas, but to live them with each other. To me, this whole crisis is a blessing, cause when people aren’t working they are available to be present and will naturally seek out others who are of the same state.

Chroma: The Key of C

In the early spring of 1990, shortly after a life altering experience, I had begun to ponder something someone had told me about why a lead crystal glass shatters when it was subject to a C Frequency. It was said that the lead in the crystal becomes excited by the frequency and the surrounding glass must give way to the vibration. It’s like the opposite of strumming and guitar string.

It dawned on me not soon after that when I glimpsed a chrome car bumper, and there was the answer staring back at me in the reflection. It was the chroma in the metal that was the direct relationship I was looking for. Chroma is the metallic nature of reflection. It has a wide range of variance and is responsible for all color in the world of phenomenon surrounding us.

For instance it is the feature within, say a leaf, that not only reflects the green spectrum of light, but also refracts, absorbs, and defuses producing color to the observer. I saw it in my mind as a tetrahedron spinning. having four isosceles-triangle sides. The spin was responsible for the variables with which it effects the light striking it. The four sides each perform a different function.

One side (clear) admits a photon of light into the tetrahedron, it then strikes the refraction (expanding the spectrum into the various colors) before striking the absorption side (catching part of the spectrum, absorbing certain parts of that spectrum). As the tetrahedron rotates catching the rest of the spectrum left behind by the absorption, it is then reflected. The speed (or frequency) of the rotation determine which parts of the spectrum it captures and reflects back out the clear window, which is now a diffuser and gives the light a texture, hence soft or hard light.

This was the first glimpse I saw into the Golden Key. I described a world, not made of pieces, but rather reflections of light embedded with laws, like gravity and fluidity (or viscosity), heat, magnetivity, and electricity. I also believed I was seeing something for the first time that was not new, but has always been there. I saw the symbols in everything around me for sometime. First I saw the seven human Chakkras, and the seven colors of the rainbow, I decided there had to as well be seven basic energies. In fact, the more I looked at the puzzle the more things began to make more sense than they ever did before.

I began seeing the direct relationship of everything could be broken down to this one code. More to come…

The Golden Key – metatonec crystaline

The Golden Key – metatonec crystaline, originally uploaded by solight_111.

This is something I’ve been working on for 20 years or so. I had a vision about lead crystal and why it shattered with a C Frequency. I am not responsible for any part of this other than putting it all together. I hope everyone enjoys it, who looks for it.

I’m planning on writing more about it soon. There are a lot of insights it would be fun to share about it!

Change vs. Momentum

It isn’t very often that a culture, or in this case ‘Many Cultures’, get a chance to engage in a complete shift of our cultural perception. The last time a shift of this scope and magnitude occurred was in the 16th Century and from my recollection of history it wasn’t handled well by the powers that, at the time, controlled the popular sway of cultural power. Part of the assertions of their power were held in the ideas predominant to that cultures’ perceptions, and as vast as those ideas may have seemed they were still leveraged in the core of mainstream ideologies.

The fascinating part of a total cultural shift in perception, is that they are completely unavoidable. No matter how in control we make ourselves out to be, we are still quite subject to it, individually or as a whole. It’s going to happen!

One of the things I’ve realized about change is that the momentum of what is must first lose steam. The tracks ahead are always covered with fog and we can’t see what’s coming. Everything about us as a specie draws from the source of history that defines us as a culture. The one thing we are not very good at, as a people, is letting go of old habits and embracing new ones. Especially when we can’t see through the depths of our subconscious need to remain the same. We feel at peace with rhythm… in control, knowing what’s coming is “comfort and safety”.

What is this tendency?… to do the same thing, live the same quality of lifestyle, while ignoring change when it is happening. This momentum is a big deal. I saw a group of people asked to change their smoking area, and it took weeks for people to comply, and once they did it was changed back to the original spot and they didn’t want to go back. So it took another week. It’s not like they were all that conditioned in such a short time, but there it was!

We see the same tendencies in our politicians and corporations right now, spending the capital of our democracy to reward selfish greed and the “desire” to stay on course. Trillions of dollars have been handed out to the chain of command in the hope they might shore up their positions against the great tide of change that is coming. You can see this in every politician selling the vision on the news, but there’s one problem these spokespersons aren’t seeing clearly. The natural tendency of acclimation to feed a frenzied driving force at the core of our perc3ptions, to shift. Literally out of boredom.

So What’s Changing?

The change has been obvious to all of us. Steve Jobs was totally correct when he told so and so at whatever investment company that this “is” the revolution. He was of course speaking about the personal computer, and specifically his own Apple computer. It wasn’t until the programmers at Xerox gave Jobs the mouse and the GUI (graphical user interface), did the windows of change finally open. It has reforged our language. We have had to enter new terms into the dictionary like multi-tasking, and googling. The internet and every form of computer driven device has changed the way we not only interact with the world, but also with each other. And, there’s no going back…

The biggest change the Internet has supported is the ability to self-empower almost anyone to get real perspectives on the information they are procuring from local sources and National News Services. It is undermining the propaganda for as many as are willing to seek out alternative views on the matters we are being faced with, day to day. The big question is… is the crisis real?

In the Matrix, Neo finally comes face to face with the Architect. He reveals to Neo that everything he has experienced in his life, which has also been at work influencing the people around him as well as his would be savior Morpheus and everyone in Zion, was considered a measure of control against a systemic collapse. From an outside observers point of view it might seem a bit at odds with their own autonomy hearing the Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve Chief echoing the same sound bites, like they were both chiming in from the same cue cards. Like a controlled burn… there’s only one problem.

“You can’t go against the Great Magnet!” – Hunter S. Thompson

The Greenspan Rule: Words are Power!

Recently I heard some blame being cast at Greenspan for the failed policies of the Federal Reserve and I think it’s ridicules unless you add it to the constant stream of mistakes being made in the Quest to “save” the economy from “catastrophe”…

I do agree that deregulation was founded on a weak cornerstone, that Banks could govern there own sense of risk, and assess it based on the longevity of their business. It’s kind of like trusting that Hedge Funds won’t drive up the price of oil, in an attempt to avoid a devaluing dollar. Because everyone knows that an inflated fuel supply could apply the brakes to an economic system in the form of inflation.

Or maybe it’s more like Short Selling. I’m sorry but that whole practice just doesn’t make any sense to me. Let me get this straight, you’re borrowing someone elses stock and selling it to buy it back for less when the price falls. Doesn’t that seem a bit adverse to a growing economy, having big financial institutions and hedge funds betting against their own pool of wealth… And whose stocks are they “borrowing”.

Anyway, I believe there’s only one answer for all the toxic assets. require the banks give them up in exchange for loans. The assets will then fall into the hands of a trust that will match them with homes that are in foreclosure, reducing the paper to their original mortgages and thereby giving them a quantitative value again. The homes would then be held until the housing markets are restored and then released slowly back into the market. An assessed value would be paid toward the debt the banks held, and profits would be used to shore up any future foreclosures. The problem is the paper.

This is the core of the problem and it could have been met with when it was occuring if it hadn’t been about the non-chalant responce by Ben Bernanke when he first acknowledged the situation in 2007. The real problem has still been left for these 2 years without fully being addressed, and 3 years since the foreclosures began.

Obama has failed to address this current crisi with the right formula to really resolve the main issue. Part of it has been addressed, but with nothing like the rigor they have addressed the condition of the fallout, that was supposedly never to happen. Spending another $2.5 Trillion to shore up the financial institutions seems like bullshit after the 700bln on top of the 2 Trillion pumped into it from the Fed., and why are those two agencies acting independently.

So, all together we are looking at about $5 Trillion, while companies and individuals are continuing to slip into foreclosure unable to borrow, and the main core problem is still on the chalkboard. The one thing that no one seems to be considering is the momentum that is being acquired and fueled by lame statements that include words like “catastrophe” and “collapse”, when economic leaders are speaking. You would have never heard Alan Greenspan make such greenhorn mistake.