Category: occupy


I’ve just got to ask.. What kind of political activist group isn’t getting politicians to vie for their endorcement in the upcoming election. Or maybe a better question is, How does an anarchist political system feel about national politics? Is it more valueable to meet (halfway) with conditions in order to overcome them, or is that just a myth?

In Argentina, international corporate politics are consider a hinderence to occupier goals of self-determination. It would be easy to say that the Occupation itself is a class endevor, but really it’s something deeper. It’s struggle lies in its very own structure, but is this really an issue worth solving or just an attempt to hold on to past ideas, no matter how well we know the past for its outcomes, but where will we land?

Occupiers in America right now have an interesting set of options that could, by exercising them, strengthen their political value and complement their own goals by supporting an official that is friendly to the cause. There are a few political options that have surfaced, in all the events, to side with the support of the Occupy Class including; Barry Sanders, Ron Paul and a few others that could be of more help, advancing the occupation, than the current leadership.

But is this selling out the core of anarchy to simply fit in with a aging system for the political comfort of the half hearted or less? Even though it has fantastic strategic implications. Another brilliant tactic to promote a richer structure for the occupation is to call for a Constitutional Convention; demand our goals be included in the v2.0. On the other hand it promotes the structure of the state run political will, or local will, but is that a needful avoidance? Shouldn’t part of the goal be to occupy local politics?

Another, more significant option, is to stregthen the community base and set further reaching future goals to take back local resources. Cities may “obtain” possession of real estate for local projects and or “other” use, etc. The bottom line is that it seems, to me, advantageous to strengthen the ideas of what Occupation can accomplish and organize around developing the infrastructure, and a sustainable business plan, for those goals. Ones that include filling the gaps of a decaying system as the need might arrise, and eventually occupying everything.

All things considered, it might help benefit the Occupiers to support a presidential candidate for 2012. It would only take a few days to make our force a condition of the next presidential race, that would have to be met with by any candidate running. Ignoring Occupy is impossible at this point. It has become an institution and should begin acting like one politically! And, if there was a move to grease our own candidate for a run in 2012, I bet we could pull it off! Wouldn’t that be an interesting revelation for folks…

An obvious shift is happening to the global culture than can easily be attributed to the introduction of the Internet. If you think about it, there is always some form of communication involved with dramatic and successful cultural shifts. The printing press, oil paints, the telegraph; these different models of communication have had dramatic affects on global perception. Each more powerful, further compressing time and space to be more obtainable. Exponentially increasing the efficiency of mass comprehension.

The Internet is a highly effective window into the history of information; the accumulative wealth of experience condensed into insight. This has a powerful resonant effect to increase the mass awareness, through the specialization of information compiling. Each new generation of information adding more resonant frequency to ideas.

In a simple form it offers, everyone connected with this information, the opportunity to discover variables hidden by acclimation or innocence. If people in Tim Buck Two are successfully accomplishing their goals, we tend to share that information with each other, and invention is necessities child.

We are actually quite ahead of the curve when it comes to new things on the Internet. In fact, a lot of the things we think are new have been brewing for years in different people. The future of our experience hasn’t caught on yet. Its still a new site with a small but dedicated membership. It may have a time in the sun eventually. It just needs a reason.

The very nature of a World Wide Web is a cauldron for innovation and anarchy. It unlocks the vales that hide the real reason behind most things, and offers us more and more ways to take action. We are uniquely entitled to make our own choice about everything, and if we find something interesting we can share it with close circles and grow more aware together.

Occupy Wall Street is the outcome of the imbalance behind the truth and lies of the media, and the capitalism behind it. It is a catalyst of ideas and experience that has proven successful for others. It is a process of learning compressed from infinite individual angles to increase the efficacy in realization, and it just opened it’s eyes!

The core message that makes this one different from other types of protests we’ve seen is the culture it forms. Without a core group setting the pace there can be little longevity in any kind of movement that stirs up the mainstream. It is designed to resist everything accept true change, which it is committed to destroy. The trap is trying to destroy it gives it strength; feeds it intent.

The call behind the cultural shift around us is information. It is opening more eyes and predicating intelligence about it. It’s a chance to talk about what is happening, to share more information directly instead of relying on the media to provide it. It’s a chance for us to call into question the very ideas that form the model of our society, scrutinize them in the light of more truth, make consensus based choices as a society of self determined individuals! Truly experience direct democracy, horizontally!

Okay, so let me address this issue that keeps coming up in conversations I’m engaged in. People ask “Why” occupy the Ports. How does it help to shut down the economy. This is a great philosophical question, and I think the Occupiers have done a pretty good job of going around it. I have heard different takes from different groups that say different things. Some say it’s a prosperity annoyance to “disagree” with the current power structure.

You know what I think? I think it’s a response to the structure shutting down the Camps. Think about it. A portion of the occupiers is a homeless crew that had more to lose from the breakup of the parks than others, add the frustration of Police enforcing rules to “silence” Freedom of Speech. Then add in the general feeling in America, the unemployment and college debt, with no hope in sight, and Boom!

It’s a shame we even have these types of interaction in our culture; our community, incommunicado. Such resistance to the freedom of happiness.  Why on Earth do we interact with such trepidation. Whose loyalties do you serve? Shouldn’t you serve your own first, and around you form a trust, just to talk…  Much can be learned from a chat! This is the position that occupiers seek to yield, but it’s a two-edged sword.

The people who are asking the question ‘why the ports?’ are right in asking this! To me it seems obvious the system, made up of so many rules and sub-rules that interlock to form the degree of perception it holds is fact! Trying to break it alerts the structure, and the structure fights back, but if one moves with the flow of water, one will eventually see the horizon.

Since the collapse of the camps, Occupy has been soul searching. looking for the next level, as some have put it. A part if the movement has their hearts set on reoccupying their camps, while another sees a different vision.

Since the fall of Chapman and Lownsdale squares and Terry Schrunk Plaza in Portland, their GA has expanded their online and community presence. NYCGA has turned their focus to the community and led a National shift, when they stopped the first foreclosure. It should be the federal government that’s actively stopping foreclosures, but it’s not! It’s the occupy movement that finally realized the  solution to bad lending habits!

Other occupy groups have followed with there own internal restructuring. Building their own solutions like office space and public spaces for meetings. Each group has begun to follow the leads of NY’s stand against foreclosures. This is a two pronged solution to the problem that the camps had inadvertently created unknowingly. Occupy now belongs to the whole 99% by submerging into the community.

Think about it. Occupy, in essence, is a simple platform that allows a community of people to engage. Engagement was the core of the general assemblies intention. Society should be chosen by the people living within it! And not the banks or the politicians that work for them.

The other thing this may effect is housing prices. Slowing or stopping the foreclosures has been the goal all along. It’s the salvo for stabilizing the dollar. If housing prices started to climb again, it would likely bring back lending and we’d be off to the races again. Highly unlikely, but that’s the theory the Fed’s betting on when they print mad cash and monetize the debt with it. The come back! It’s coming!

But consider this! The banks and the US created this issue by failing to regulate the banks, that were directly creating the mess. Then, they got together and, right in front of us, agree to solve their issues with “our” flippen money. Then… They turn around and start taking homes our men and women built with their sweat and labor, and the US let’s them! WTF!

Well, at this point, all I can say is apropos. They say that necessity is the mother of invention and I give you the inertial response to reckless policies. Occupy Our Homes was born out of a void left from the camp raids. It is motivated by an imbalance of political will and rhetoric, while exasperated by the shear desire for true change. And, it might just be the correct move to right the economy.

And wouldn’t that just piss off the Tea Baggers. I think Occupy should shanghai the entire movement, Co-Opt the Tea Party! Instead of dressing up like Indian’s (which are from India BTW) I could see a whole crowd of pretty Church world suits and red bow ties, and Fox News Media Supplies.

But… as an anarchist movement, we should definitely give the event some of the natural colors so famous for the dirty homelessly disorganized krusties that just took hold of the entire planets curiosity. OMG! What do they want?!

And there lies the beauty of the entire movement in a nutshell. The divine power of silence. Truth is that we aren’t enough of the whole to make decisions for the rest of us. What is Occupy, is very easy to answer! It is the chance to talk about our society with each other.  It’s not so much a direction that occupation holds, it’s the way.

The Call to the Ports should be a call to something worthy of the entire movement. Set an example to others in the World of what true value holds for a public gathered. What our society has as its strength and core value is the people who call it home! The foundation of this event called America is the Constitution that proclaims our intentions as Americans, and what we expect as a culture!

Why isn’t every event like its own Burning Man? Why don’t we gather to celebrate our culture. Instead we are met at the gates of our serenity by Police in Bad Costumes for anything fun! Buzz kill, if you ask me! Remember the good old days? Well don’t feel bad, neither can I. All I know about the World around me started with Vietnam, so the whole Freedom things seems a bit theoretical if you were to ask me!

Here’s the thing I have never understood throughout my life. The World around me seems effortless to define, and we all go along with it, but what if it’s the wrong description of the events were seeing? What if it’s something other than the one were reporting to each other, confirming? What if it’s a progression that is leading us through the events and revealing the path along the way! Seems a bit obvious, but what if the change is already happening to us as we figure it out, which innately changes our environment, and we adjust to the change.

Straight up I can tell you that I don’t have a lot of faith in the idea that the Man is going to fold in on itself. Or that we will ever secure substantial or lasting change with the cooperation of  the current system’s momentum. Our goal is not perfection, but rather the principles of freedom be expressed. To stand against this in any way is just silly, and frankly that is my feeling on the way authority practices position, and whether they like it or not, they ultimately serve the people.

We are a Star Fish!

 

 

 

It’s seems pretty likely at this point that the people resting in the positions of power in the US have chosen to defend the Institution vs. defend the Constitution. They have coordinated an attack against the 1st. Amendment Rights of American’s, by sending in hundreds of Police wearing riot armor to stop the Free Expression of citizens protected under that Constitution. They have Sworn Oaths to Defend and Protect the Constitution.

This is an open call to bring the Constitution into the future of all Americans. It has been treated without regard for the words contained within it. The Patriot Act and House Apportionment Rules.

The only constitutional rule relating to the size of the House says: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand.”[4] Congress regularly increased the size of the House to account for population growth until it fixed the number of voting House members at 435 in 1911.[1] The number was temporarily increased to 437 in 1959 upon the admission of Alaska and Hawaii (seating one representative from each of those states without changing existing apportionment), and returned to 435 four years later, after the reapportionment consequent to the 1960 census. –  wikipedia

The intentions of the Founders made it clear that the goal of the House was meant to be a amorphous public voice driven by the  shifts in popular trends. Locking in the number at 435 is like taking the voice of the public interest away; making it more susceptible to the influences inherent in Capitalism . This direction has led this country inexorably down a road further and further marked by the distance from the average US citizen.

The Fourth Amendment has been crippled by those who seek to undermine the protections we all share under the Constitution, to practice our right to privacy. This has been outdated by technological advances that couldn’t be foreseen by the founders and needs to be addressed.  These changes to the basic notion that Congress can shape the Constitutional meaning to fit whatever scenario they have invented for the American People, but I tell you this, there is a process for changing the Constitution called an Amendment. It must be approved by 2/3 of the states within a year, and makes the Patriot Act illegal, as does the idea that our phones can be tapped, ever, without a warrant.

This leaves American Citizens only one way to call into question the positions of Authority, that they be governed by the people they represent. That we call for a Constitutional Convention

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government

These words took time to resolve, even as a free sovereign community. We have every right to stand up and be heard as Americans with a legacy of rebellion in our history.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government.”

Fortunately we haven’t reached a time where we have entirely lost faith in the system we have. We have in fact come just in time to save the general agreement we have as Citizens of the US to engage in an Open Dialog that gives the proper respect to the founding ideas this country was forged by. Whether or not it is respected, we are a Democracy of People and choose to support the surrounding environment politically, but if it can no longer be proved to be a representative system, then we are demanded by the founders to perform this “Duty”!

It is the wish of this group that we begin the dialog to talk about the Constitution. How can we keep money out of political processes, and how can we clearly define the things like Apportionment at 30,000-1. We Call for a Constitutional Convention, and demand representation clearly defined as “public”.

We demand a Constitutional Convention!

First let me mention that I don’t agree at all with the idea that American’s can not put up a tent as an expression of free speech. I think that’s a piss poor decision for the courts, considering “flag burning” is okay, but camping is a health and safety issue. Look, I don’t know about you, but I feel like TSA is a huge waste of my time in a free society. I put up with it during the big 911 response, but it’s time to get back to being Americans!

Occupy, in my eyes, is riding along prevailing winds, and has only begun to reveal the energy and brilliance behind it. So, here we are at the eve of having the biggest Occupy camps in the country dismantled by the Man! This is where a dozen news groups and media outlets will do their best to play on the unknown about it, as a scare tactic to weaken the movement. “They don’t know what they want?” or “They need a leader to be considered real”. But here’s the thing…

If you consider the language of the event; camps across the country are gone, and now the morph begins. Having a bunch of big camps was starting to play out a bit “socialist/liberal” for me. Oakland has even called for a support action of Washington Port Workers. Personally I think it needs to grow roots now. Take the time this Winter to seep into the community and plan front-yard CSA’s. Take to the streets to collect funding for space, and help Bank Customers learn about the differences in Banking institutions.

Small groups of Community Assemblies have begun forming in every town in the country. It makes sense that if America is going to change, that we should have a conversation about it. I find it amazing that our media and political systems have escaped the reality that we can do whatever we want. It’s the whole reason the Constitution was written. And, what is being revealed is the difference between the people and the institutions. Shame on the coordinating with local law enforcement. The idea that that all happened so precisely without central coordination is ridiculous. It reveals that there has been a break between the Constitution and the People who will defend it!

It’s time for the culture of America to meet and discuss the fate of our society. If people don’t or won’t see the dangers in the Fed actions to support the World’s economy by printing money and monetizing debt, then don’t worry about it. But if you see what I see, then you see the need for a true dialog with the members of this ship to discuss the current situation and options available to us as Americans! The World is defined by our willingness to engage with it. It can be anything we want.

Occupy and the Wisdom of Gandhi

It’s very natural for the human experience to measure energy in momentum. The senses are build, in effect, to measure change as proof that something exists. I think therefor I am, is a mini of this theory. I am, and not an effect, that convinces me of this truth, but it is rather purely an effect of my being that I choose to express myself through thought.

I have always believed in the adage, “live by the sword, die by the sword”, and I can’t help but see this playing out in the World’s effects of the roots and core of all the existing cultures of the world, that seem to be teetering between existence and extinction economically. And what good has it done to be in the ranks of the “too big to fail” belief, when it comes to economic sustainability. Rome was too big to fail and guess what!

My point continues when I reflect on the polar opposite of this in the observation of India. India’s freedom was born out of suffrage to England and won it’s independence from them through non violent action. The problem with the current state of India is equal to the currnt state of the western cultures, that once owned India’s people in a colonial gridlock. It is vulnerable to the same economic imbalance and fractured loyalties in a community sense. So what is the best way to form a true and natural society?

This problem has literally kept me up at night whenever I have taken the time to consider it. I wish the answer was simple, but I fear it is rather illusive as long as we frame it into the familiar. The same problem exists in every science. It has, so far, been ruled by the human ego. Call it inertia or call it stubborn, but man abhors change. It is built into the fabric of our being to love and commit to the familiar. The patterns of repetition. It is the comfort of the mind to expect the rhythm of consistency. It is our legacy as a specie!

The problem with change is the unfamiliar, or at least the mind has this issue. It likes the familiar and if we are associating with that (mind) as the self then our sense of it concurs. The fact is that we project change out of acclimation. Consciousness often conflicts with the mind when it comes to these places, in the midst of transition. If necessity is the mother of invention, then boredom is the father of revolution!

This has all come out of my feelings for the Oakland occupy group calling for shutting down the west coast ports. I have heard that occupy San Diego has agreed and rumored to be joined by other groups and all I can do is trust that it won’t change anything. Even if the actions are successful I have to wonder what the purpose is. It’s not like the movement needs to gather anymore attention. The entire world is watching everything the occupiers do. But, is it wise to act against the workflow and livelihoods of the people we are trying to win over? The 99%…

Frankly I believe it not a wisely thought out, goal oriented, action that will succeed at bringing any real or lasting social change. It doesn’t express the desire once held by the early movement to bring balance to the economic playing field by creating jobs or ending control of the banks and their political and corporate rule of the direction of America. It may threaten trade and even hurt the economy a little, but what’s so different about that that the banks aren’t already doing. Inflation and fuel costs are already stressing out the public and this kind of action seems a bit pointless. But it is an anarchist movement and I’m inclined to acquiesce, it’s just not very loquacious.

On the other hand, wouldn’t that time, energy and collective force be better put to work building more sustainability into our society. What if we gathered the same kind of force into neighborhood yard gardens or solar and wind power collections. What if we spent that time talking to the people who bank with the problems, or spent it setting up thousands of small autonomous neighborhood occupy groups to discuss the entire culture and change everything forever. This seems like it solves the live by the sword motto and gives an added ingredient to Gandhi’s partial solution, that might be what it needs to bring a long term, if not permanent, solution to the problem of our whole global village… Decentralized leaderless governance!

No, it isn’t the high flying energy of a stand off with police that has really made YouTube an e-ticket lately, and it probably won’t get the UC Davis photo-ops that have made us all laugh with shame, but… It might be a great first step to much bigger actions that just may change the world in ways we haven’t even imagined! Something to think about.

An Open Letter to the Occupy Movement

Hi guys,

Let me just start by saying thank you for your devotion to the human side of community and the right of being a citizen of the constitution! It’s awesome, don’t ever stop!! I wanted to respond to your invitation to offer suggestions about the idea of indoor space for meeting and such. I think it’s a great direction and can really give the movement the legs needed to carry it into the future.

When I consider the idea of Occupy in the future, the one thing I feel needs to be a preamble of growth and sustainability is the same key that makes a GA meeting and the anarchist framework the right choice for organizing a group. Obviously it has grown using this tool (GA) and organization from 60 to millions. The tool is listening! In a circle we listen to each other, and this is important. We don’t make decisions without hearing everyone. We need to do the same thing with the future, by listening to the moment and the community we are surrounded by in order to win the next battle, which is the loyalties of the community of Portland and the Greater Multnomah County. Because, whether they know it or not, they are part of our struggle and will make Occupy, as a movement, even stronger when all the 99% are accounted for.

I believe that Occupy like any organization needs to be self-supporting through their own contributions. This approach has worked for AA and can work just as well for GA. I believe it can be just as empowering for Occupy to do fund raising, and canvassing for basic needs to strengthen the logistical base and share vital information with community about what we’re doing and who we are. It has worked well for the Sierra Club and other organizations that wish to gain community support and funding for wildlife protection projects and legal representation to stop developments that can endanger our back yard. Places that this can be done can double as a way to inform bank customers about their choice of banking. If we canvas banks and talk to their customers, we can be changing things in more way than one!

Having a central Camp in town, just to show that “we are here” has been played out. I believe that we need to keep a presence, but sitting in town isn’t going to win the PR side of the battle and what Occupy needs to make real change is everyone else of the 99%! The Apache successfully challenged the mighty Spanish Armies in the America’s for 200 years with small groups, who remained autonomous to act independently. Leadership was an action and not a person! Occupy could, through canvassing neighborhoods and facilitating smaller neighborhood groups, create a dialog in every neighborhood made up of the people who live in that neighborhood. Actions for smaller groups can focus on self-sustaining measures like “Front Yard CSA’s” or energy projects that help change these (our) neighborhoods permanently. Find a space, like AA does, canvas the neighborhood, and facilitate General Assemblies and allow them to shape it autonomously, to fit the needs of the community! In time we will have won the PR side and the numbers may soon constitute bigger campaigns, like mortgage strikes, general corporate strikes, or consumer strikes.

I know that these measures alone cannot bring down the entire system without a presence, or people will forget what has become so important to so many people. I have friends with families and businesses that support what we are doing, but would never consider taking their children to large marches and risk their families. This does not mean that they are not behind it. In fact one of my friends contacted me in tears because she was worried it might end before any real changes could happen and she is counting on us! A public presence is the biggest, most impactful, action the occupy movement has used to gain its still growing support from. It should continue, and utilize the entire movement’s energy to bring the noise! That’s why I believe it should be considered that a “central” GA take place a few times a week in a very public way. It doesn’t need to stop the lives of the working-class, but it should be a gathering of everyone in the county!

Lastly, I would like to believe that Occupy is helping to bring choices to our government, that allows it to listen to the people, but I fail to see how the system won’t just return back to it’s natural state of impossible. Calling for a Constitutional Convention that gives the the people a say to the details could happen, but what I see is tactics looking to end the movement, and getting them to agree to terms will only give them the same luxury the Senate is reflecting with budget passing and Tea Bagger antics. Politicians can be bought and General Assemblies can’t. I believe that we are the Change! And, if we act like the future of America and the Global Village we are part of, we will never go away and everyone will be free because of it!!!

Peace!
Michael Light
solight111@klickdse.com

The last few days of national media coverage has made it pretty clear we’ve entered the next phase of posturing for the influence currency of the Nations attention. Oakland being the obvious one where a 24 year old Iraq veteran, who served two tours, was shot in the head with a flash projectile.

The media decided to go with, “no one knows who launched the projectile that hit him”, while several witnesses said the police were firing tears gas and flash bombs at the crowd around eye level. It reminds me of the type of backlash that came from authorities during the civil rights movement.

The latest spin from the mainstream media has been from mayors who say that laws must be respected, as hundreds of people across the country have been arrested for “suspicion of illegal lodging”, as well as reporting that the protesters have been testing the patience of residence in the area, with noise, unsanitary conditions and drunken fighting. They have also complain that the camps are becoming a refuge for the homeless.. It’s a pretty pathetic response to a constitutionally bound exercise of the people rights to free speech, free assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress grievances.

Ironically the parks authorities are claiming belong to the people are the ones they are trying to control. The fact is that “parks” are listed as one of several places considered to be public forums for legal protests, according to the supreme court. Also it should be noted that the first amendment is consider above all other laws in this country. If the homeless want to gather and protest it’s their right and doesn’t fall under social moray judgements of who can and can’t participate in protests. Obviously if there was more jobs and more affordable housing there would be less homeless. The real issue they help to point out by being their is the massive imbalance in the economic conditions the banks created with unregulated and horribly risky lending practices, not to mention betting against their own investors. It’s a shame really, that this even needs to be mentioned and that our whole culture still resists the idea of community.

I would like to praise Keith Olbermann for his diligence in reporting the truth, as well as The Last Word on MSNBC. Otherwise the news is still only available through the social media sites, which has remained highly effective at getting word out.

Now we are about to see how far the system is willing to separate themselves from the people they serve with a recent introduction of a bill in the house that is the first cannon fired in the war. This bill wants to hold sights like YouTube and Facebook legally responsible for the content of their sites. That way they can just make up charges like inciting mayhem and shut the site down. It doesn’t matter if the law is unconstitutional as long as they have a way to tie them up in court while the cops do whatever they want. The key is they silence the social media influence behind people seeing reports in their daily status. Out of sight out if mind.

Ironically this won’t work at all. The fact is that if legal measures shut down the big sites like Facebook there will be ten other to take it’s place. The problem is this law attacks the very thing they seem to be trying to protect and that’s the successful businesses and corporations out there. Facebook if estimated to be worth $80+ billion dollars. Its one of the job providers in the US and you want to destroy that in order to protect the banks? I think it’s time to check the signatures on your paychecks kids. You’re supposed to be working for the people who sign them, not the ones who print them!

—————————————————————————————-

Socialmedia Influence - Currency of the Future book coverSocialmedia Influence – Currency of the Future is now available on Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and Amazon.de

25% of royalties go to support the Occupywallstreet Movement.

Michael Light started Endoflex in 2006 to report the beginnings of the Subprime Mortgage Industry Fallout and has continued with the recent Occupy – United for Global Change.

Occupy Wall Street has changed the way we see the media, and it’s relationship to the powerful influencers of the World, and may even be the spark that ignites the shift from monetary policy influence to Socialmedia Influence. Michael Light reveals this shift in his book with a succinctly humorous history of influence and the shifts that have preceded what may be the next Global paradigm shift.

Join the conversation on Facebook

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.