In 2006, it was hard for me to imagine the response the Fed would offer about the rise in Foreclosures, which pointed to a horrible lending practice that had been thriving through the last few years previous to it. During that time Sub Prime lending was coming of age. It produced a total of no less than $3 Trillion dollars worth of risky loans. The obvious solution, to me, at the time was to restore the conditions of the original titles, to the properties these trillions of certificates represented. The issue during the crisis was, “how to price something no one wants to buy”, which lent to the nickname “Toxic”.
In Goldman Sachs 2010 SEC filing, these previously “Toxic” bonds with a thousand different acronyms, are now being referred to as “Fair Value Financial Instruments”. The Federal Reserve has accepted over $2 Trillion worth of these, as collateral for loans to the banks who would have collapsed in 08 had they been kept on their books. Banks during the crisis were leery to lend to each other on the general concern that these notes or securities were worthless, and that these institutions holding them needed to dramatically ‘write down’ their value. Instead the Fed offered to take them for collateral, under the auspices that they could be traded later when the crisis had passed thereby earning the US a profit for helping.
The challenge for me and lots of other investors is the casual nature that seems to be the “New Federal Reserve”. Gone is the Greenspan age of diligent research and proactive policies. It was a shock to me when I read Ben Bernanke’s comments to Congress in 2007, that the Subprime fallout would stay in the subprime industry and “shouldn’t be” a threat to the general economy. Instead it led to some of the worst days in our economic history, and throwing out uneducated (or un-researched) guesses about something of a $3 Trillion dynasty seems surprising to me.
Today the Wall Street Journal reported that the Fed had failed to disclose some $80 Billion dollars worth of loans it had made to several of the groups that were leading the battle cry for this flimsy market of massive risk. Throughout 2008, from March through December, the Fed loaned $80 billion to institutes like Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank AG, in an attempt to provide liquidity to support more mortgage lending and keep the mortgage security industry moving, while slightly after the main fallout in 08, the Fed was telling Congress that they needed more oversight powers in order to avoid a systemic failure if the future ever presented the opportunity. What I want to know is why didn’t the SEC look into what was happening with the ratings agencies when Steve Eisman went to them with a detailed outline of the market and it’s risks!
I recently had a chance to read, “The Big Short”, by Michael Lewis, which outlines the Subprime Market through it’s various faces and gives the perspectives of men like Steve Eismen who were shorting the market by purchasing Credit Default Swaps, while financial institutes like Goldman Sachs were using the same default insurance to give customers confidence in the products. Everyone claims this was to make cheap credit available for everyone, but what will the over-all cost be when the dust finally settles; when the only thing that changed is the words used to describe the original problem and the original problem still looms in the form of massive debt.
Now the task of getting the US Dollar back on track (solving the deficit) has fallen to the politicians to work out and I have a pretty strong feeling that party pride will weigh in against any wise choices. The fact is that even the best economists, mathematicians and social psychologists, coupled with all the facts and the green light to do whatsoever is necessary to solve the puzzle and put the US Economy back on track would probably not like the options. The one thing I’m sure of is that everything is hinged on the continuing US Dollar, which is now in the hands of a 2 party political drama… Curious.
—————————————————————————————-
Socialmedia Influence – Currency of the Future is now available on Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, and Amazon.de
25% of royalties go to support the Occupywallstreet Movement.
Michael Light started Endoflex in 2006 to report the beginnings of the Subprime Mortgage Industry Fallout and has continued with the recent Occupy – United for Global Change.
Occupy Wall Street has changed the way we see the media, and it’s relationship to the powerful influencers of the World, and may even be the spark that ignites the shift from monetary policy influence to Socialmedia Influence. Michael Light reveals this shift in his book with a succinctly humorous history of influence and the shifts that have preceded what may be the next Global paradigm shift.
Join the conversation on Facebook


